The
History Of Stony Branch Valley
(Part 2)
The First Settlers
Michael
Hillman
With the end of the French and
Indian War, settlers once again began to move the
wilderness frontier westward. Stony Branch, situated
just north of the Monocacy Road, the major transit route
for Dutch and German immigrants heading from Lancaster
to settlements in the Shenandoah, was ripe for
settlement. Full of streams and rolling hills, its
picturesque countryside reminded many settlers of the
homes they had left in Europe. The beauty of the land
was further enhanced by its availability and cost and
many settlers saw little reason to travel further.
The
settlers had several options open to them for acquiring
land. There was land for lease, for sale, and even some
land left to homestead. Daniel Dulany, who held title to
Buck Forest, a 3,300 acre track of land which lies at
the headwaters of Stony Branch, just to the east of
Mount Saint Mary's, offered settlers leases on 100 acre
lots at five pounds per year. There were a few
stipulations however, including requirements to plant
100 apple trees and install and maintain sturdy fencing.
The lessees were then still faced with the arduous tasks
of building a home and clearing the land. If they
questioned whether this was a good or bad deal, they
just needed to do a little mathematics to evaluate the
true cost of the lease.
As it
turns out, in 1770 an average day laborer earned about 2½ shillings a day. Twenty shillings make up a pound so
a 5 pound lease payment could be worked off in forty
days. In other words, the land would cost them a little
over 15% of their yearly earnings. Compare that to today
where the average rent on a home or apartment often
consumes upwards to 50% of the yearly income for those
earning minimum wage. Compound that with the fact that
apartments and houses are sized in square feet not
acres. Dulany's offer worked out to be a bargain for all
concerned. Laborers got cheap rent on land, Dulany
retained title while his land was cleared. planted and
fenced.
However
appealing the lease route seemed to some, there were
others who took a different approach. Benjamin Biggs and
William Diggs chose to sell their land holdings outright
and pocket the profit. In 1770, land in Stony Valley
could be bought for about ½ pound per acre, or four
days of work. Today, this same farm land is appraised at
$2,000 per acre, or roughly 40 days of work at minimum
wage. Thus over the last 200 years, farm land in Stony
Branch has increased in value, after accounting for
inflation, by a factor of at least ten-fold. The
increase in the relative value of the land reflects not
only the difference in the supply of land but in the
substantial infrastructure of roads, schools, courts,
and the myriad of services that society has invested in
over the intervening 200 years.
Compare
the land the settlers thought was cheap to this. Suppose
you were offered as much land in the valley as you
wanted at only $200 per acre today, would you think it a
bargain? This is basically the same offer given the
original settlers and they answered it by snapping up as
much land as they could reasonably afford.
Even
though the Stony Branch Valley was considered the
frontier, it was by no means uninhabited. By 1770, there
were at least ten homesteads in the lower valley. Though
close together by today’s standards, when one
considers that travel was by foot or horse, they were
far enough away to offer a true sense of isolation. The
closest organized community to Stony Branch, known today
as Thurmont, was a good three-hour horseback ride away.
Frederick, then known as Fredricktown, was a day’s
ride away.
To
clear the land required a Herculean effort. Carving a
homestead out of the wilderness, was a process repeated
over and over again by each new settler to the valley.
Mathias and Anna Zacharias typified the effort required.
The Zacharias family’s land was located about a
quarter of a mile north of the mouth of the Monocracy
and stretched north to the union of the two western
river forks. Mathias and Ann's first task was to build a
shelter for their young family of three. Until the cabin
was built, the only shelter afforded the Zacharias’
was probably a lean-to, set up next to the wagon that
had carried them to the valley. The simple log cabin
would be expected to house the family for months, if not
years, until such time as other more urgent chores, such
as clearing fields for planting, would permit the
erection of a permanent and more spacious and
comfortable dwelling.
The
site selected by Mathias and his wife for their cabin
was surrounded by old walnut trees on what was then
called Honey Ridge, which overlooks where the present
Zacharias house now stands. With nothing more than an ax
and a horse to assist him, Mathias stacked logs from the
virgin forest until the structure was seven feet high.
He then added crosspieces for rafters, erected a
ridgepole some five feet above the top logs and then put
the framing in place to support the roof. Time would
usually not permit the splitting of shingles, so the
roof was probably made of bark or thatch. The interiors
of such cabins usually had one room downstairs and half
a floored loft to provide additional sleeping quarters
so they could make mad passionate love in the sweet hay.
The
urgency for providing shelter was coupled with that of
preparing fields which would feed the family and furnish
a livelihood. The land was virgin and clearing it of
trees and brush involved hard, backbreaking work with
almost primitive axes, scythes and saws. Mathias and
Anna cultivated the land in the time-honored way of
plowing with a single-row horse drawn plow, harrowing
and leveling by dragging a weighted sled. Seed was then
broadcast by hand. When crops were ready for harvest,
the entire Zacharias family went into the field. Some
cut the grain with scythes, others bundled the stalks
into sheaves. One can easily picture the three Zacharias
children, Mathias Jr., Anna Elizabeth and Maria
Elizabeth helping their parents gather crops late into
the evening.
Mathias
Zacharias died in 1773, nineteen years after first
setting foot in the valley. Following the tradition of
the time, Mathias was buried on a hill overlooking his
farm. At the ripe old age of sixteen, Mathias's only son
found himself responsible for the welfare of his mother
and two young sisters. In many ways Mathias Zacharias
was lucky, having only one son, he never had to worry
about acquiring additional land for his son, as Benjamin
Whitmore did.
In
1763, Benjamin Whitmore and his family, lured by the
offer of cheap land, left Lancaster and selected a site
for his new home on the east side of Tom’s Creek, part
of Diggs’ Lot. He contacted William Diggs, the owner
of the land, and arranged to rent 120 acres until such
time as he could pay in full the 50 pounds asking price
of the land. Benjamin, with the help of his five sons,
made rapid progress in establishing his farm and making
it pay off. Having paid off his first farm in 1764,
Benjamin purchased from John Darnall a 96 acre track of
land, which Darnall had named ‘Whiskey Bottle’,
following its purchase in 1756 from Jonathan Hays. The
following year, Benjamin Whitmore became Benjamin
Biggs’ first customer in Biggs' effort to resell his
‘Benjamin’s Good Luck’ land holdings. The 200-acre
purchase on the western side of Tom's creek, opposite
the original Whitmore homestead and just north of his
‘Whiskey Bottle’ track, almost doubled Benjamin
Whitmore’s land holdings in the valley.
Over
the following years, Benjamin Whitmore continued to
reinvest the profits, from the efforts of his four
strong sons, in additional land. At the time of his
death in 1769, Benjamin Whitmore's land holdings in the
valley totaled 632 acres. Benjamin's four sons held
their father's estate under common title for the next
thirty years, only formally dividing when their advanced
age required them to begin to settle their accounts in
this world. Like Mathias Zacharias, Benjamin Whitmore
had accomplished what he had set out to do - provide
security and a future for his wife and children.
Benjamin Whitmore was laid to rest in a plot near his
house on the land which he loved. The site selected was
on a knoll overlooking the surrounding countryside with
a view of hills and valleys beyond.
We know
much about the trials and tribulations, thrills and
achievements of the Zacharias and Whitmores as a result
of the efforts of their descendants. Unfortunately,
little is known about many of the other first purchasers
of land out of Diggs' Lot and ‘Benjamin’s Good
Luck’. For example, we know little about Nicholas
Owery who, in 1754, purchased 100 acres of land on both
sides of Keysville Road, just east of the present Tom's
Creek Bridge. Owery resold the land to Christian Keefer
in 1774 and then simply disappeared into history. In
1761 Robert Redock purchased 150 acres of land on both
sides of the now Four Points Road, which he sold ten
years later to John Crabbs, who shortly thereafter built
the first mill on Tom's Creek, which would become known
in history as Maxell's Mill.
In
1763, John Paterson purchased 183 acres on both sides on
what is now Four Points Road, between its intersection
of Sixes Bridge Road and Tom's Creek Bridge. Like
Nicholas Owrey, John Paterson also disappeared into
history. In 1770 John Marker purchased 100 acres from
Benjamin Biggs. While little is known of him, Markers'
daughter would one day become the matriarch of the Six's
dynasty in this area. That same year, Thomas Kunnard
purchased 61 acres between the Monocacy and the now
Sixes Bridge and sold it the following year at a 25%
profit to Henry Forney, the patriarch of the Forney
families in this valley.
By
1771 the valley was filling up and the price of land
began to rise sharply, almost tripling with Philip
Miller’s purchase of 300 acres on both side of Sixes
Bridge Road, from present day Grimes Road to just north
of Sixes Bridge. Not all land was sold to settlers. Much
of the land was sold to smaller land speculators like
Conrad Hockersmith who in 1770 purchased 142 acres of
land in the valley, which he resold 4 years later at a
400% profit to Christian Keefer.
The
seeds of prosperity that were being sown by the settlers
in the valley, however, were being carried on the winds
of revolution. Following the end of the French and
Indian War, the British Government, in hopes of keeping
peace with the Mohawk Nation, which had sided with the
French, passed a proclamation which said no land could
be settled west of the Appalachian Mountains. Colonist
felt cheated when they heard about the proclamation.
Owning land meant everything to them, for without it,
they had no position in society, even voting was denied
those without land.
At
first, the proclamation had little real effect, as
colonist concentrated their efforts on claiming open
land on the eastern side of the Appalachians, such as
Stony Branch Valley. However, many restless colonists
soon joined the ranks of Benjamin Biggs, who after
selling what was left of his ‘Benjamin's Good Luck’
to his brother William in 1771, crossed the Appalachians
and settled in the fertile Ohio Valley. Faced with open
violation of his proclamation, King George issued the
Quartering Act, which required colonists to provide
housing and supplies for British soldiers.
The
French and Indian War had also caused Britain to go
deeply into debt. Keeping an army on the frontier meant
additional cost to the British Empire. To pay for these
additional costs, the British government passed the
Stamp Act. This act required that each sheet of every
legal document carry a stamp showing that a tax had been
paid. It was the first attempt by the British government
to directly tax the American colonies.
The
colonists reacted with rage. For them, the issue was
clear. The colonies had no representation in the English
Parliament, and therefore, under English law, they could
not be taxed. "No taxation without
representation" became the rallying cry, which
would echo across the land, from meetings in John
Crabb's Mill on Tom’s Creek, to Bunker Hill. Across
the land, the spirit of revolution was growing and it
would soon manifest itself in open revolt. In answer to
its call, many of those who had struggled to establish
homesteads in Stony Branch, like Mathias Zacharias,
would now risk all to establish a future for their
progeny, free of tyranny and fear.
Read
Part 3
Index of
articles on the
History Stony Branch Valley
Read
more articles by Michael Hillman
|